batchCooking/packages/shared/src/schemas/planning.ts
Nicolas 1c62625c47
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 52s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m30s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m38s
CI / intent-service-test (push) Successful in 3m32s
CI / test (push) Successful in 14m17s
feat(planning): attribution et jet des restes + exclusion liste de courses / cuisine
PR 2/4 du chantier « gestion des restes » (issue #34).

Deux nouvelles routes sur `/planning` :
- `POST /planning/items/leftover` → `assignLeftoverPlanningItem`, 201.
  Crée un item « restes » (`sourcePlanningItemId` non nul) sur un créneau,
  même recette que la source (`recipeId` copié, jamais envoyé par le
  client). `portions` revérifié serveur contre le pool réellement
  disponible via `computeAvailableLeftover` → 409
  `LEFTOVER_QUANTITY_EXCEEDED` (nouveau code, 4024) si dépassé ; 404
  `PLANNING_ITEM_NOT_FOUND` si source inconnue / d'un autre foyer / elle-
  même un item « restes » (pas de restes-sur-restes).
- `PATCH /planning/items/:id/discard-leftover` → `discardLeftover`, 200.
  Jette tout le pool restant (`discardedPortions += disponible`) ;
  idempotent (rien à jeter → renvoyé inchangé, aucun évènement).

Exclusion : `shopping-list.service.ts` et `cooking-session.service.ts`
filtrent `items: { where: { sourcePlanningItemId: null } }` dans leur
`include` — un créneau qui ne fait que resservir un plat déjà cuisiné n'a
rien à acheter ni à cuisiner. `getPlanningForDate` ne filtre pas (la
grille affiche ces items).

Analytics : `planning.leftover_assigned` / `planning.leftover_discarded`.

Le mapping `PlanningItem` → `PlanningItemView` est factorisé
(`toPlanningItemView`) — 4 chemins le partagent désormais.

Tests (Mocha, DB) : `assignLeftoverPlanningItem` (succès + `recipeId`
copié, 409 sur dépassement, 404 source étrangère/inconnue/« restes »,
cascade à la suppression de la source) ; `discardLeftover` (jette le
disponible, idempotent, ne jette pas ce qui est déjà servi, 404) ;
non-régression liste de courses et session de cuisine ignorant les items
« restes ».

Réf #34

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 23:53:25 +02:00

64 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript

import { z } from "zod";
import { MEALS, WEEK_DAYS } from "../types/planning.js";
// See schemas/auth.ts for the shared client/server validation rationale.
/**
* Payload accepted by `GET /planning`'s `?date=` query param. Only checks
* the `YYYY-MM-DD` *shape* — whether it's a real calendar date (e.g.
* rejecting `2026-02-30`) is checked service-side via
* `@batch-cooking/date-tools`'s `parseDateOnly`, not here: `packages/shared`
* has no runtime dependencies of its own, and pulling in a date library just
* for this one check isn't worth losing that.
*/
export const getPlanningByDateSchema = z.object({
date: z.string().regex(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/, "Date invalide"),
});
/** Inferred TS type for {@link getPlanningByDateSchema}'s validated output. */
export type GetPlanningByDateInput = z.infer<typeof getPlanningByDateSchema>;
/**
* Payload accepted by `POST /planning/items` — adds a recipe to one
* (day, meal) slot of the household's planning for the week containing
* `date`, creating that week's `Planning` row on the fly if it doesn't
* exist yet (see `planning.service.ts`'s `addPlanningItem`). `weekDay`/
* `meal` are finally validated against a closed set here — until now
* `WEEK_DAYS`/`MEALS` were only a documented convention (see their doc
* comments in `types/planning.ts`), never enforced, since no write endpoint
* existed yet.
*/
export const addPlanningItemSchema = z.object({
date: z.string().regex(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/, "Date invalide"),
weekDay: z.enum(WEEK_DAYS),
meal: z.enum(MEALS),
recipeId: z.number().int().positive(),
/**
* How many portions this slot must actually feed. The server derives the
* batched `portions` to prepare from this plus the recipe's own yield
* (`computeBatchedPortions`, `@batch-cooking/shared`) — the client never
* sends `portions` directly. See `PlanningItemView.portionsRequested`.
*/
portionsRequested: z.number().int().positive("Le nombre de portions doit être positif"),
});
/** Inferred TS type for {@link addPlanningItemSchema}'s validated output. */
export type AddPlanningItemInput = z.infer<typeof addPlanningItemSchema>;
/**
* Payload accepted by `POST /planning/items/leftover` — serves `portions`
* of another item's leftover pool on the `(date, weekDay, meal)` slot,
* creating a "leftovers" `PlanningItem` (see `planning.service.ts`'s
* `assignLeftoverPlanningItem`). `recipeId` is deliberately **not** here:
* a leftovers item can only be the same recipe as its source, so the
* server copies it from `sourceItemId` rather than trusting the client.
* `portions` is re-checked against the pool actually still available
* server-side — a client value over that is a `409 LEFTOVER_QUANTITY_EXCEEDED`.
*/
export const assignLeftoverSchema = z.object({
date: z.string().regex(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/, "Date invalide"),
weekDay: z.enum(WEEK_DAYS),
meal: z.enum(MEALS),
sourceItemId: z.number().int().positive(),
portions: z.number().int().positive("Le nombre de portions doit être positif"),
});
/** Inferred TS type for {@link assignLeftoverSchema}'s validated output. */
export type AssignLeftoverInput = z.infer<typeof assignLeftoverSchema>;